<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norton 360</title>
	<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/</link>
	<description>Within Don Parker's blog various computer network security issues are discussed. Find coverage on topics such as patch management techniques, reverse engineering, IDS and IPS evasion, anti-virus and firewall usage. Commentary on the top network security news stories and rumors in the blogsphere. Analysis of common security issues faced by Microsoft Windows users and information is shared to help train network security analysts.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 01:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-93207</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-93207</guid>
					<description>Yes,  I agree with Robert, Really backup program is primitive,and it is really difficult to use, but I found another anti-spyware www.search-and-destroy.com it is really easy to utilize.

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,  I agree with Robert, Really backup program is primitive,and it is really difficult to use, but I found another anti-spyware <a href='http://www.search-and-destroy.com' rel='nofollow'>www.search-and-destroy.com</a> it is really easy to utilize.</p>
<p>Good Luck!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-24793</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-24793</guid>
					<description>Hi Robert,

I would be inclined to agree with you on your criticism of the backup part of 360. Hopefully this will be smoothed out in future versions of this product. Either way, Symantec has greatly improved this product over the past couple of years.

--Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>I would be inclined to agree with you on your criticism of the backup part of 360. Hopefully this will be smoothed out in future versions of this product. Either way, Symantec has greatly improved this product over the past couple of years.</p>
<p>&#8211;Don
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-24788</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/04/03/norton-360/#comment-24788</guid>
					<description>I just purchased Norton 360, and with the exception of the backup application, it looks like a well designed product. Unfortunately the backup program is crude, dysfunctional, and unnecessarily difficult to use. It doesn't have the standard easy to use interface we've all learned to expect wherein you can check or uncheck folders you want to backup or exclude from the backup. That's hard to believe. 

In addition, despite my selecting MANUAL backups, the application insists upon Automatically backing up files. I don't understand why.

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased Norton 360, and with the exception of the backup application, it looks like a well designed product. Unfortunately the backup program is crude, dysfunctional, and unnecessarily difficult to use. It doesn&#8217;t have the standard easy to use interface we&#8217;ve all learned to expect wherein you can check or uncheck folders you want to backup or exclude from the backup. That&#8217;s hard to believe. </p>
<p>In addition, despite my selecting MANUAL backups, the application insists upon Automatically backing up files. I don&#8217;t understand why.</p>
<p>Robert
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
