<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computer network design and defense</title>
	<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/</link>
	<description>Within Don Parker's blog various computer network security issues are discussed. Find coverage on topics such as patch management techniques, reverse engineering, IDS and IPS evasion, anti-virus and firewall usage. Commentary on the top network security news stories and rumors in the blogsphere. Analysis of common security issues faced by Microsoft Windows users and information is shared to help train network security analysts.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Aamy Lee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-159283</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-159283</guid>
					<description>Nice Article... Thanks for giving such a great idea....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Article&#8230; Thanks for giving such a great idea&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex Saca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-97924</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-97924</guid>
					<description>If the designing of the computer network is perfect nobody will experience any problem while accessing the data...Good..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the designing of the computer network is perfect nobody will experience any problem while accessing the data&#8230;Good..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emre Yazgan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8418</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8418</guid>
					<description>thank you MR Parker...Have a nice new year.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you MR Parker&#8230;Have a nice new year&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8415</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8415</guid>
					<description>Hello Emre,

NetBIOS protocols are required for what Windows does best ie: networking computers and sharing files. Due to this you would want to leave them functioning. Just do your best to secure access to file shares ie: don't allow inbound traffic through your router for port 137, 138, 139 and 445, use passwords and so on.

Cheers,

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Emre,</p>
<p>NetBIOS protocols are required for what Windows does best ie: networking computers and sharing files. Due to this you would want to leave them functioning. Just do your best to secure access to file shares ie: don&#8217;t allow inbound traffic through your router for port 137, 138, 139 and 445, use passwords and so on.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Don
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emre Yazgan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8413</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8413</guid>
					<description>oh ok..thankx again....Also everybody  speaks about NETBIOS vulnerability..Do you agree that it is a very important threat for our Windows security..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh ok..thankx again&#8230;.Also everybody  speaks about NETBIOS vulnerability..Do you agree that it is a very important threat for our Windows security..?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8377</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8377</guid>
					<description>Hello Emre,

What you do is disallow NetBIOS broadcasts between subnets. That would entail not allowing port 137, 138, 139, and 445 to traverse subnets. Port 135 is the DCERPC service. 

Cheers,

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Emre,</p>
<p>What you do is disallow NetBIOS broadcasts between subnets. That would entail not allowing port 137, 138, 139, and 445 to traverse subnets. Port 135 is the DCERPC service. </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Don
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emre Yazgan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8370</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.windowsecurity.com/parker/2007/01/03/computer-network-design-and-defense/#comment-8370</guid>
					<description>hi in advance....we have to close NetBIOS?(port 135)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi in advance&#8230;.we have to close NetBIOS?(port 135)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
